Catégories
CBNPMP-Thèmes > Ecologie et géographie botanique > Ecologie générale > Stratégies et plans d'action de gestion de la biodiversité > Restauration des écosystèmes
Restauration des écosystèmes |
Documents disponibles dans cette catégorie (272)
![](./images/expand_all.gif)
![](./images/collapse_all.gif)
[article]
Titre : When local isn't best Type de document : Électronique Auteurs : Thomas A. Jones (1942-) Année de publication : 2013 Article en page(s) : 1109-1118 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thèmes] Restauration des écosystèmes
[CBNPMP-Thèmes] Revégétalisation
[CBNPMP-Thèmes] Végétal local
[CBNPMP-Thèmes] Diversité génétiqueRésumé : This paper attempts to explain circumstances under which local may be or may not be best. Natural selection may lead to local adaptation (LA), or it may be constrained by gene flow, founder effects, small population size, genetic drift, and archetype. ‘Specialist’ species display greater LA than ‘generalist’ species. Local genotypes are to a certain extent transient, being a consequence of past historical genetic patterns. Two recent meta-analyses found that while local performance exceeded the performance of a randomly chosen nonlocal population in 71% of comparisons, general adaptation across environments was as frequent as LA. Genotypes for restoration are most likely to be effective if they are adapted to current site conditions. As environmental change accelerates, both globally and locally, exceptions to ‘local is best’ may increase. For these reasons, ‘local is best’ may be better thought of as a testable hypothesis rather than as a general assumption. While either local or nonlocal plant material may be most effective for restoration practice depending on individual circumstances, local material will continue to be the first choice for restoration practitioners whenever this option is feasible and effective. Lien pérenne : DOI : 10.1111/eva.12090 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=148375
in Evolutionary applications > 6 (7) (November 2013) . - 1109-1118Jones, TA. 2013. When local isn't best. Evolutionary applications, 6(7): 1109-1118.Documents numériques
Consultable
Article (2013)URLWriting woody plant specifications for restoration and mitigation projects / Susan Buis in Native Plants Journal, 1 (2) (2000)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Writing woody plant specifications for restoration and mitigation projects Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Susan Buis Année de publication : 2000 Article en page(s) : 116-119 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thèmes] Génétique et écologie (dynamique, démographique, sélection)
[CBNPMP-Thèmes] Restauration des écosystèmes
[CBNPMP-Thèmes] RevégétalisationRésumé : Describing what types of native plants to include in restoration and mitigation projects requires knowledge about plant species, genetics, form and size, health, and possible substitutions available from local nurseries. A thorough understanding of project goals and plant characteristics will ensure success. Lien pérenne : DOI : 10.3368/npj.1.2.116 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=148699
in Native Plants Journal > 1 (2) (2000) . - 116-119Buis, S. 2000. Writing woody plant specifications for restoration and mitigation projects. Native Plants Journal, 1(2): 116-119.Documents numériques
Consultable
Article (2000)URL