Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Paul Stebbing |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Affiner la recherche
Biosecurity and Vector Behaviour: Evaluating the Potential Threat Posed by Anglers and Canoeists as Pathways for the Spread of Invasive Non-Native Species and Pathogens / Lucy G Anderson in PloS ONE, 9 (4) (2014)
[article]
Titre : Biosecurity and Vector Behaviour: Evaluating the Potential Threat Posed by Anglers and Canoeists as Pathways for the Spread of Invasive Non-Native Species and Pathogens Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Lucy G Anderson ; Piran C. L. White ; Paul Stebbing ; Grant Stentiford ; Alison M. Dunn Année de publication : 2014 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : Invasive non-native species (INNS) endanger native biodiversity and are a major economic problem. The management of pathways to prevent their introduction and establishment is a key target in the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Aichi biodiversity targets for 2020. Freshwater environments are particularly susceptible to invasions as they are exposed to multiple introduction pathways, including non-native fish stocking and the release of boat ballast water. Since many freshwater INNS and aquatic pathogens can survive for several days in damp environments, there is potential for transport between water catchments on the equipment used by recreational anglers and canoeists. To quantify this biosecurity risk, we conducted an online questionnaire with 960 anglers and 599 canoeists to investigate their locations of activity, equipment used, and how frequently equipment was cleaned and/or dried after use. Anglers were also asked about their use and disposal of live bait. Our results indicate that 64% of anglers and 78.5% of canoeists use their equipment/boat in more than one catchment within a fortnight, the survival time of many of the INNS and pathogens considered in this study and that 12% of anglers and 50% of canoeists do so without either cleaning or drying their kit between uses. Furthermore, 8% of anglers and 28% of canoeists had used their equipment overseas without cleaning or drying it after each use which could facilitate both the introduction and secondary spread of INNS in the UK. Our results provide a baseline against which
to evaluate the effectiveness of future biosecurity awareness campaigns, and identify groups to target with biosecurity awareness information. Our results also indicate that the biosecurity practices of these groups must improve to reduce the likelihood of inadvertently spreading INNS and pathogens through these activities.Lien pérenne : DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0092788 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=146670
in PloS ONE > 9 (4) (2014)Anderson, Lucy G, White, Piran C. L., Stebbing, Paul, Stentiford, Grant, Dunn, Alison M. 2014 Biosecurity and Vector Behaviour: Evaluating the Potential Threat Posed by Anglers and Canoeists as Pathways for the Spread of Invasive Non-Native Species and Pathogens. PloS ONE, 9(4).Documents numériques
Consultable
Article (2014)URL Using structured eradication feasibility assessment to prioritize the management of new and emerging invasive alien species in Europe / Olaf Booy in Global Change Biology, 26 (11) (2020)
[article]
Titre : Using structured eradication feasibility assessment to prioritize the management of new and emerging invasive alien species in Europe Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Olaf Booy ; Pete A. Robertson ; Niall Moore ; Jess Ward ; Helen E. Roy ; Tim Adriaens ; Richard Shaw ; Johannes Leonardus Cornelis Hendrikus van Valkenburg (1964) ; Gabrielle Wyn ; Sandro Bertolino ; Olivier Blight ; Étienne Branquart ; Giuseppe Brundu ; Joe Caffrey ; Dario Capizzi ; J. Casaer ; Olivier De Clerck ; Neil E. Coughlan ; Eithne Davis ; Jamie T. A. Dick ; Franz Essl (1973-) ; Guillaume Fried ; Piero Genovesi (1960-) ; Pablo González-Moreno ; Frank Huysentruyt ; Stuart R. Jenkins ; Francis Kerckhof ; Frances Lucy ; Wolfgang Nentwig (1953-) ; Jonathan Newman ; Wolfgang Rabitsch (1968-) ; Sugoto Roy ; Uwe Starfinger ; Paul Stebbing ; Jan Stuyck ; Mike Sutton-Croft ; Elena Tricarico ; Sonia Vanderhoeven ; Hugo Verreycken ; Aileen C. Mill Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : 6235-6250 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : Prioritizing the management of invasive alien species (IAS) is of global importance and within Europe integral to the EU IAS regulation. To prioritize management effectively, the risks posed by IAS need to be assessed, but so too does the feasibility of their management. While the risk of IAS to the EU has been assessed, the feasibility of management has not. We assessed the feasibility of eradicating 60 new (not yet established) and 35 emerging (established with limited distribution) species that pose a threat to the EU, as identified by horizon scanning. The assessment was carried out by 34 experts in invasion management from across Europe, applying the Non-Native Risk Management scheme to defined invasion scenarios and eradication strategies for each species, assessing the feasibility of eradication using seven key risk management criteria. Management priorities were identified by combining scores for risk (derived from horizon scanning) and feasibility of eradication. The results show eradication feasibility score and risk score were not correlated, indicating that risk management criteria evaluate different information than risk assessment. In all, 17 new species were identified as particularly high priorities for eradication should they establish in the future, whereas 14 emerging species were identified as priorities for eradication now. A number of species considered highest priority for eradication were terrestrial vertebrates, a group that has been the focus of a number of eradication attempts in Europe. However, eradication priorities also included a diverse range of other taxa (plants, invertebrates and fish) suggesting there is scope to broaden the taxonomic range of attempted eradication in Europe. We demonstrate that broad scale structured assessments of management feasibility can help prioritize IAS for management. Such frameworks are needed to support evidence-based decision-making. Lien pérenne : DOI : 10.1111/gcb.15280 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=153671
in Global Change Biology > 26 (11) (2020) . - 6235-6250Booy, Olaf, Robertson, Pete A., Moore, Niall, Ward, Jess, Roy, Helen E., Adriaens, Tim, Shaw, Richard, Valkenburg, Johannes Leonardus Cornelis Hendrikus van (1964), Wyn, Gabrielle, Bertolino, Sandro, Blight, Olivier, Branquart, Étienne, Brundu, Giuseppe, Caffrey, Joe, Capizzi, Dario, Casaer, J., De Clerck, Olivier, Coughlan, Neil E., Davis, Eithne, Dick, Jamie T. A., Essl, Franz (1973-), Fried, Guillaume, Genovesi, Piero (1960-), González-Moreno, Pablo, Huysentruyt, Frank, Jenkins, Stuart R., Kerckhof, Francis, Lucy, Frances, Nentwig, Wolfgang (1953-), Newman, Jonathan, Rabitsch, Wolfgang (1968-), Roy, Sugoto, Starfinger, Uwe, Stebbing, Paul, Stuyck, Jan, Sutton-Croft, Mike, Tricarico, Elena, Vanderhoeven, Sonia, Verreycken, Hugo, Mill, Aileen C. 2020 Using structured eradication feasibility assessment to prioritize the management of new and emerging invasive alien species in Europe. Global Change Biology, 26(11): 6235-6250.Documents numériques
Consultable
article (2020)URL