Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Ross N. Cuthbert |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (6)
Affiner la rechercheBiological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide / Ross N. Cuthbert in Science of the total environment, 819 (2022)
Titre : Biological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Ross N. Cuthbert ; Christophe Diagne ; Emma J. Hudgins ; Anna Tuberlin ; Danish A. Ahmed ; Céline Albert ; Thomas W. Bodey ; Elizabeta Briski ; Franz Essl (1973-) ; Phillip J. Haubrock ; Rodolphe E. Gozlan ; Natalia Kirichenko ; Melina Kourantidou ; Andrew M. Kramer ; Franck Courchamp Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : 153404 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : The global increase in biological invasions is placing growing pressure on the management of ecological and economic systems. However, the effectiveness of current management expenditure is difficult to assess due to a lack of standardised measurement across spatial, taxonomic and temporal scales. Furthermore, there is no quantification of the spending difference between pre-invasion (e.g. prevention) and post-invasion (e.g. control) stages, although preventative measures are considered to be the most cost-effective. Here, we use a comprehensive database of invasive alien species economic costs (InvaCost) to synthesise and model the global management costs of biological invasions, in order to provide a better understanding of the stage at which these expenditures occur. Since 1960, reported management expenditures have totalled at least US$95.3 billion (in 2017 values), considering only highly reliable and actually observed costs — 12-times less than damage costs from invasions ($1130.6 billion). Pre-invasion management spending ($2.8 billion) was over 25-times lower than post-invasion expenditure ($72.7 billion). Management costs were heavily geographically skewed towards North America (54%) and Oceania (30%). The largest shares of expenditures were directed towards invasive alien invertebrates in terrestrial environments. Spending on invasive alien species management has grown by two orders of magnitude since 1960, reaching an estimated $4.2 billion per year globally (in 2017 values) in the 2010s, but remains 1–2 orders of magnitude lower than damages. National management spending increased with incurred damage costs, with management actions delayed on average by 11 years globally following damage reporting. These management delays on the global level have caused an additional invasion cost of approximately $1.2 trillion, compared to scenarios with immediate management. Our results indicate insufficient management — particularly pre-invasion — and urge better investment to prevent future invasions and to control established alien species. Recommendations to improve reported management cost comprehensiveness, resolution and terminology are also made. Identifiant : DOI : 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153404 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=154688
in Science of the total environment > 819 (2022) . - 153404Cuthbert, Ross N., Diagne, Christophe, Hudgins, Emma J., Tuberlin, Anna, Ahmed, Danish A., Albert, Céline, Bodey, Thomas W., Briski, Elizabeta, Essl, Franz (1973-), Haubrock, Phillip J., Gozlan, Rodolphe E., Kirichenko, Natalia, Kourantidou, Melina, Kramer, Andrew M., Courchamp, Franck 2022 Biological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide. Science of the total environment, 819: 153404.Documents numériques
Consultable
Article (2022)Adobe Acrobat PDF
Titre : Biological invasions are as costly as natural hazards Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Anna J. Turbelin ; Ross N. Cuthbert ; Franz Essl (1973-) ; Phillip J. Haubrock ; Anthony Ricciardi (1965-) ; Franck Courchamp Année de publication : 2023 Article en page(s) : 143-150 Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : Natural hazards — such as storms, floods, and wildfires — can be disastrous phenomena and so can biological invasions, for which impacts are often irrevocable and insidious. Yet, biological invasion awareness remains low compared to natural hazards, and investments to manage invasions remain vastly underfunded and delayed. Here, we quantified biological invasion costs relative to natural hazards, to raise awareness and political leverage. Analysing biological invasions and natural hazards damage cost data over 1980–2019, economic losses from biological invasions were of similar magnitude to natural hazards (e.g., $1,208.0 bn against $1,913.6 bn for storms and $1,139.4 bn for earthquakes). Alarmingly, invasion costs increased faster than natural hazards over time. Similar biological invasions impact magnitudes to natural hazards and faster cost growth rates urge commensurate recognition, coordination and action towards invasions in policies. Identifiant : DOI : 10.1016/j.pecon.2023.03.002 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=151810
in Perspectives in ecology and conservation > 21 (2) (April-June 2023) . - 143-150Turbelin, Anna J., Cuthbert, Ross N., Essl, Franz (1973-), Haubrock, Phillip J., Ricciardi, Anthony (1965-), Courchamp, Franck 2023 Biological invasions are as costly as natural hazards. Perspectives in ecology and conservation, 21(2): 143-150.Documents numériques
Consultable
Article (2023)URL
Titre : Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Phillip J. Haubrock ; Anna J. Turbelin ; Ross N. Cuthbert ; Ana Novoa ; Nigel G. Taylor ; Elena Angulo ; Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia ; Thomas W. Bodey ; César Capinha ; Christophe Diagne ; Franz Essl (1973-) ; Marina Golivets ; Natalia Kirichenko ; Melina Kourantidou ; Boris Leroy ; David Renault ; Laura N. H. Verbrugge ; Franck Courchamp Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : 153-190 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : Coûts économiques des espèces exotiques envahissantes en Europe. Les invasions biologiques continuent de menacer la stabilité des écosystèmes et des sociétés qui dépendent de leurs services. Alors que les impacts écologiques des espèces exotiques envahissantes (EEE) ont été largement signalés au cours des dernières décennies, il reste peu d’informations concernant les impacts économiques des EEE. L’Europe a de solides liens commerciaux et de transport avec le reste du monde, facilitant des centaines d’incursions d’EEE et des cadres décisionnels largement centralisés. Cette étude est le premier effort complet et détaillé qui quantifie les coûts des EEE collectivement dans les pays européens et examine les tendances temporelles de ces données. En outre, la répartition des coûts entre les pays, les secteurs socio-économiques et les groupes taxonomiques est examinée, de même que les corrélats socio-économiques des coûts de gestion et des dommages. Le coût total des EEE en Europe s’est élevé à 140,20 milliards de dollars américains (ou 116,61 milliards d’euros) entre 1960 et 2020, la majorité (60%) étant liée aux dommages et ayant un impact sur plusieurs secteurs. Les coûts étaient également géographiquement répandus, mais dominés par les impacts dans les grands pays d’Europe occidentale et centrale, à savoir le Royaume-Uni, l’Espagne, la France et l’Allemagne. La taille de la population humaine, la superficie terrestre, le PIB et le tourisme étaient des prédicteurs importants des coûts d’invasion, les coûts de gestion étant en outre prédits par le nombre d’espèces introduites, l’effort de recherche et le commerce. Temporairement, les coûts d’invasion ont augmenté de façon exponentielle au fil du temps, atteignant jusqu’à 23,58 milliards de dollars (19,64 milliards d’euros) en 2013 et 139,56 milliards de dollars (116,24 milliards d’euros) d’impacts extrapolés en 2020. Il est important de noter qu’il subsiste des lacunes dans les connaissances à plusieurs échelles géographiques et taxonomiques bien que ces coûts soient substantiels, ce qui indique que ces coûts sont fortement sous-estimés. Nous suggérons donc une augmentation et une amélioration des rapports sur les coûts des impacts économiques des EEE et une action internationale coordonnée pour prévenir la propagation et atténuer les impacts des populations d’EEE. Identifiant : DOI : 10.3897/neobiota.67.58196 En ligne : https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/58196/ Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=153602
in Neobiota > 67 (2021) . - 153-190Haubrock, Phillip J., Turbelin, Anna J., Cuthbert, Ross N., Novoa, Ana, Taylor, Nigel G., Angulo, Elena, Ballesteros-Mejia, Liliana, Bodey, Thomas W., Capinha, César, Diagne, Christophe, Essl, Franz (1973-), Golivets, Marina, Kirichenko, Natalia, Kourantidou, Melina, Leroy, Boris, Renault, David, Verbrugge, Laura N. H., Courchamp, Franck 2021 Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe. Neobiota, 67: 153-190.
Titre : Invasive alien species as simultaneous benefits and burdens: trends, stakeholder perceptions and management Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Melina Kourantidou ; Phillip J. Haubrock ; Ross N. Cuthbert ; Thomas W. Bodey ; Bernd Lenzner ; Rodolphe E. Gozlan ; Martin A. Nuñez ; Jean-Michel Salles ; Christophe Diagne ; Franck Courchamp Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : 1905-1926 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : In addition to being a major threat to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, biological invasions also have profound impacts on economies and human wellbeing. However, the threats posed by invasive species often do not receive adequate attention and lack targeted management. In part, this may result from different or even ambivalent perceptions of invasive species which have a dual effect for stakeholders—being simultaneously a benefit and a burden. For these species, literature that synthesizes best practice is very limited, and analyses providing a comprehensive understanding of their economics are generally lacking. This has resulted in a critical gap in our understanding of the underlying trade-offs surrounding management efforts and approaches. Here, we explore qualitative trends in the literature for invasive species with dual effects, drawing from both the recently compiled InvaCost database and international case studies. The few invasive species with dual roles in InvaCost provide evidence for a temporal increase in reporting of costs, but with benefits relatively sporadically reported alongside costs. We discuss methods, management, assessment and policy frameworks dedicated to these species, along with lessons learned, complexities and persisting knowledge gaps. Our analysis points at the need to enhance scientific understanding of those species through inter- and cross-disciplinary efforts that can help advance their management. Identifiant : DOI : 10.1007/s10530-021-02727-w / HAL : hal-03524617
Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=155473
in Biological invasions > 24 (2022) . - 1905-1926Kourantidou, Melina, Haubrock, Phillip J., Cuthbert, Ross N., Bodey, Thomas W., Lenzner, Bernd, Gozlan, Rodolphe E., Nuñez, Martin A., Salles, Jean-Michel, Diagne, Christophe, Courchamp, Franck 2022 Invasive alien species as simultaneous benefits and burdens: trends, stakeholder perceptions and management. Biological invasions, 24: 1905-1926.Documents numériques
article (2022)URL
Titre : Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Ismael Soto ; Paride Balzani ; Laís Carneiro ; Ross N. Cuthbert ; Rafael L. Macedo ; Ali Serhan Tarkan ; Danish A. Ahmed ; Alok Bang ; Karolina Barcela-Spychalska ; Sarah A. Bailey ; Thomas Baudry ; Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia ; Alejandro Bortolus ; Elizabeta Briski ; J. Robert Britton ; Milos Buric ; Morelia Camacho-Cervantes ; Carlos Cano-Barbacil ; Denis Copilas-Ciocianu ; Neil E. Coughlan ; Pierre Courtois ; Zoltán Csabai ; Tatenda Dalu ; Vanessa De Santis ; James W. E. Dickey ; Romina D. Dimarco ; Jannike Falk-Andersson ; Romina D. Fernandez ; Margarita Florencio ; Ana Clara S. Franco ; Emili García-Berthou ; Daniela Giannetto ; Milka M. Glavendekic ; Michał Grabowski ; Gustavo Heringer ; Ileana Herrera ; Wei Huang ; Katie L. Kamelamela ; Natalia Kirichenko ; Antonin Kouba ; Melina Kourantidou ; Irmak Kurtul ; Gabriel Laufer ; Boris Lipták ; Chunlong Liu ; Eugenia López-López ; Vanessa Lozano ; Stefano Mammola ; Agnese Marchini ; Valentina Meshkova ; Marco Milardi ; Dmitri L. Musolin ; Martin A. Nuñez ; Francisco J. Oficialdegui ; Jiri Patoka ; Zarah Pattison ; Daniel Pincheira-Donoso ; Marina Piria ; Anna F. Probert ; Jess Jessen Rasmussen ; David Renault ; Filipe Ribeiro ; Gil Rilov ; Tamara B. Robinson ; Axel E. Sanchez ; Evangelina Schwindt ; Josie South ; Peter Stoett ; Hugo Verreycken ; Lorenzo Vilizzi ; Yong-Jian Wang ; Yuya Watari ; Priscilla M. Wehi ; András Weiperth ; Peter Wiberg-Larsen ; Sercan Yapici ; Baran Yogurtçuoglu ; Rafael D. Zenni ; Bella S. Galil ; Jamie T. A. Dick ; James C. Russell ; Anthony Ricciardi (1965-) ; Daniel Simberloff (1942-) ; Corey J. A. Bradshaw ; Phillip J. Haubrock Année de publication : 2024 Article en page(s) : 1357-1390 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : Standardised terminology in science is important for clarity of interpretation and communication. In invasion science – a dynamic and rapidly evolving discipline – the proliferation of technical terminology has lacked a standardised framework for its development. The result is a convoluted and inconsistent usage of terminology, with various discrepancies in descriptions of damage and interventions. A standardised framework is therefore needed for a clear, universally applicable, and consistent terminology to promote more effective communication across researchers, stakeholders, and policymakers. Inconsistencies in terminology stem from the exponential increase in scientific publications on the patterns and processes of biological invasions authored by experts from various disciplines and countries since the 1990s, as well as publications by legislators and policymakers focusing on practical applications, regulations, and management of resources. Aligning and standardising terminology across stakeholders remains a challenge in invasion science. Here, we review and evaluate the multiple terms used in invasion science (e.g. ‘non-native’, ‘alien’, ‘invasive’ or ‘invader’, ‘exotic’, ‘non-indigenous’, ‘naturalised’, ‘pest’) to propose a more simplified and standardised terminology. The streamlined framework we propose and translate into 28 other languages is based on the terms (i) ‘non-native’, denoting species transported beyond their natural biogeographic range, (ii) ‘established non-native’, i.e. those non-native species that have established self-sustaining populations in their new location(s) in the wild, and (iii) ‘invasive non-native’ – populations of established non-native species that have recently spread or are spreading rapidly in their invaded range actively or passively with or without human mediation. We also highlight the importance of conceptualising ‘spread’ for classifying invasiveness and ‘impact’ for management. Finally, we propose a protocol for classifying populations based on (i) dispersal mechanism, (ii) species origin, (iii) population status, and (iv) impact. Collectively and without introducing new terminology, the framework that we present aims to facilitate effective communication and collaboration in invasion science and management of non-native species. Identifiant : DOI : 10.1111/brv.13071 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=154518
in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society > 99 (4) (2024) . - 1357-1390Soto, Ismael, Balzani, Paride, Carneiro, Laís, Cuthbert, Ross N., Macedo, Rafael L., Tarkan, Ali Serhan, Ahmed, Danish A., Bang, Alok, Barcela-Spychalska, Karolina, Bailey, Sarah A., Baudry, Thomas, Ballesteros-Mejia, Liliana, Bortolus, Alejandro, Briski, Elizabeta, Britton, J. Robert, Buric, Milos, Camacho-Cervantes, Morelia, Cano-Barbacil, Carlos, Copilas-Ciocianu, Denis, Coughlan, Neil E., Courtois, Pierre, Csabai, Zoltán, Dalu, Tatenda, De Santis, Vanessa, Dickey, James W. E., Dimarco, Romina D., Falk-Andersson, Jannike, Fernandez, Romina D., Florencio, Margarita, Franco, Ana Clara S., García-Berthou, Emili, Giannetto, Daniela, Glavendekic, Milka M., Grabowski, Michał, Heringer, Gustavo, Herrera, Ileana, Huang, Wei, Kamelamela, Katie L., Kirichenko, Natalia, Kouba, Antonin, Kourantidou, Melina, Kurtul, Irmak, Laufer, Gabriel, Lipták, Boris, Liu, Chunlong, López-López, Eugenia, Lozano, Vanessa, Mammola, Stefano, Marchini, Agnese, Meshkova, Valentina, Milardi, Marco, Musolin, Dmitri L., Nuñez, Martin A., Oficialdegui, Francisco J., Patoka, Jiri, Pattison, Zarah, Pincheira-Donoso, Daniel, Piria, Marina, Probert, Anna F., Rasmussen, Jess Jessen, Renault, David, Ribeiro, Filipe, Rilov, Gil, Robinson, Tamara B., Sanchez, Axel E., Schwindt, Evangelina, South, Josie, Stoett, Peter, Verreycken, Hugo, Vilizzi, Lorenzo, Wang, Yong-Jian, Watari, Yuya, Wehi, Priscilla M., Weiperth, András, Wiberg-Larsen, Peter, Yapici, Sercan, Yogurtçuoglu, Baran, Zenni, Rafael D., Galil, Bella S., Dick, Jamie T. A., Russell, James C., Ricciardi, Anthony (1965-), Simberloff, Daniel (1942-), Bradshaw, Corey J. A., Haubrock, Phillip J. 2024 Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 99(4): 1357-1390.Documents numériques
Article (2024)URL
Permalink
