Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Danish A. Ahmed |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (3)
Affiner la rechercheBiological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide / Ross N. Cuthbert in Science of the total environment, 819 (2022)
Titre : Biological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Ross N. Cuthbert ; Christophe Diagne ; Emma J. Hudgins ; Anna Tuberlin ; Danish A. Ahmed ; Céline Albert ; Thomas W. Bodey ; Elizabeta Briski ; Franz Essl (1973-) ; Phillip J. Haubrock ; Rodolphe E. Gozlan ; Natalia Kirichenko ; Melina Kourantidou ; Andrew M. Kramer ; Franck Courchamp Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : 153404 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : The global increase in biological invasions is placing growing pressure on the management of ecological and economic systems. However, the effectiveness of current management expenditure is difficult to assess due to a lack of standardised measurement across spatial, taxonomic and temporal scales. Furthermore, there is no quantification of the spending difference between pre-invasion (e.g. prevention) and post-invasion (e.g. control) stages, although preventative measures are considered to be the most cost-effective. Here, we use a comprehensive database of invasive alien species economic costs (InvaCost) to synthesise and model the global management costs of biological invasions, in order to provide a better understanding of the stage at which these expenditures occur. Since 1960, reported management expenditures have totalled at least US$95.3 billion (in 2017 values), considering only highly reliable and actually observed costs — 12-times less than damage costs from invasions ($1130.6 billion). Pre-invasion management spending ($2.8 billion) was over 25-times lower than post-invasion expenditure ($72.7 billion). Management costs were heavily geographically skewed towards North America (54%) and Oceania (30%). The largest shares of expenditures were directed towards invasive alien invertebrates in terrestrial environments. Spending on invasive alien species management has grown by two orders of magnitude since 1960, reaching an estimated $4.2 billion per year globally (in 2017 values) in the 2010s, but remains 1–2 orders of magnitude lower than damages. National management spending increased with incurred damage costs, with management actions delayed on average by 11 years globally following damage reporting. These management delays on the global level have caused an additional invasion cost of approximately $1.2 trillion, compared to scenarios with immediate management. Our results indicate insufficient management — particularly pre-invasion — and urge better investment to prevent future invasions and to control established alien species. Recommendations to improve reported management cost comprehensiveness, resolution and terminology are also made. Lien pérenne : DOI : 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153404 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=154688
in Science of the total environment > 819 (2022) . - 153404Cuthbert, Ross N., Diagne, Christophe, Hudgins, Emma J., Tuberlin, Anna, Ahmed, Danish A., Albert, Céline, Bodey, Thomas W., Briski, Elizabeta, Essl, Franz (1973-), Haubrock, Phillip J., Gozlan, Rodolphe E., Kirichenko, Natalia, Kourantidou, Melina, Kramer, Andrew M., Courchamp, Franck 2022 Biological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide. Science of the total environment, 819: 153404.Documents numériques
Consultable
article (2022)Adobe Acrobat PDF
Titre : Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Ismael Soto ; Paride Balzani ; Laís Carneiro ; Ross N. Cuthbert ; Rafael L. Macedo ; Ali Serhan Tarkan ; Danish A. Ahmed ; Alok Bang ; Karolina Barcela-Spychalska ; Sarah A. Bailey ; Thomas Baudry ; Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia ; Alejandro Bortolus ; Elizabeta Briski ; J. Robert Britton ; Milos Buric ; Morelia Camacho-Cervantes ; Carlos Cano-Barbacil ; Denis Copilas-Ciocianu ; Neil E. Coughlan ; Pierre Courtois ; Zoltán Csabai ; Tatenda Dalu ; Vanessa De Santis ; James W. E. Dickey ; Romina D. Dimarco ; Jannike Falk-Andersson ; Romina D. Fernandez ; Margarita Florencio ; Ana Clara S. Franco ; Emili García-Berthou ; Daniela Giannetto ; Milka M. Glavendekic ; Michał Grabowski ; Gustavo Heringer ; Ileana Herrera ; Wei Huang ; Katie L. Kamelamela ; Natalia Kirichenko ; Antonin Kouba ; Melina Kourantidou ; Irmak Kurtul ; Gabriel Laufer ; Boris Lipták ; Chunlong Liu ; Eugenia López-López ; Vanessa Lozano ; Stefano Mammola ; Agnese Marchini ; Valentina Meshkova ; Marco Milardi ; Dmitri L. Musolin ; Martin A. Nuñez ; Francisco J. Oficialdegui ; Jiri Patoka ; Zarah Pattison ; Daniel Pincheira-Donoso ; Marina Piria ; Anna F. Probert ; Jess Jessen Rasmussen ; David Renault ; Filipe Ribeiro ; Gil Rilov ; Tamara B. Robinson ; Axel E. Sanchez ; Evangelina Schwindt ; Josie South ; Peter Stoett ; Hugo Verreycken ; Lorenzo Vilizzi ; Yong-Jian Wang ; Yuya Watari ; Priscilla M. Wehi ; András Weiperth ; Peter Wiberg-Larsen ; Sercan Yapici ; Baran Yogurtçuoglu ; Rafael D. Zenni ; Bella S. Galil ; Jamie T. A. Dick ; James C. Russell ; Anthony Ricciardi (1965-) ; Daniel Simberloff (1942-) ; Corey J. A. Bradshaw ; Phillip J. Haubrock Année de publication : 2024 Article en page(s) : 1357-1390 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : Standardised terminology in science is important for clarity of interpretation and communication. In invasion science – a dynamic and rapidly evolving discipline – the proliferation of technical terminology has lacked a standardised framework for its development. The result is a convoluted and inconsistent usage of terminology, with various discrepancies in descriptions of damage and interventions. A standardised framework is therefore needed for a clear, universally applicable, and consistent terminology to promote more effective communication across researchers, stakeholders, and policymakers. Inconsistencies in terminology stem from the exponential increase in scientific publications on the patterns and processes of biological invasions authored by experts from various disciplines and countries since the 1990s, as well as publications by legislators and policymakers focusing on practical applications, regulations, and management of resources. Aligning and standardising terminology across stakeholders remains a challenge in invasion science. Here, we review and evaluate the multiple terms used in invasion science (e.g. ‘non-native’, ‘alien’, ‘invasive’ or ‘invader’, ‘exotic’, ‘non-indigenous’, ‘naturalised’, ‘pest’) to propose a more simplified and standardised terminology. The streamlined framework we propose and translate into 28 other languages is based on the terms (i) ‘non-native’, denoting species transported beyond their natural biogeographic range, (ii) ‘established non-native’, i.e. those non-native species that have established self-sustaining populations in their new location(s) in the wild, and (iii) ‘invasive non-native’ – populations of established non-native species that have recently spread or are spreading rapidly in their invaded range actively or passively with or without human mediation. We also highlight the importance of conceptualising ‘spread’ for classifying invasiveness and ‘impact’ for management. Finally, we propose a protocol for classifying populations based on (i) dispersal mechanism, (ii) species origin, (iii) population status, and (iv) impact. Collectively and without introducing new terminology, the framework that we present aims to facilitate effective communication and collaboration in invasion science and management of non-native species. Lien pérenne : DOI : 10.1111/brv.13071 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=154518
in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society > 99 (4) (2024) . - 1357-1390Soto, Ismael, Balzani, Paride, Carneiro, Laís, Cuthbert, Ross N., Macedo, Rafael L., Tarkan, Ali Serhan, Ahmed, Danish A., Bang, Alok, Barcela-Spychalska, Karolina, Bailey, Sarah A., Baudry, Thomas, Ballesteros-Mejia, Liliana, Bortolus, Alejandro, Briski, Elizabeta, Britton, J. Robert, Buric, Milos, Camacho-Cervantes, Morelia, Cano-Barbacil, Carlos, Copilas-Ciocianu, Denis, Coughlan, Neil E., Courtois, Pierre, Csabai, Zoltán, Dalu, Tatenda, De Santis, Vanessa, Dickey, James W. E., Dimarco, Romina D., Falk-Andersson, Jannike, Fernandez, Romina D., Florencio, Margarita, Franco, Ana Clara S., García-Berthou, Emili, Giannetto, Daniela, Glavendekic, Milka M., Grabowski, Michał, Heringer, Gustavo, Herrera, Ileana, Huang, Wei, Kamelamela, Katie L., Kirichenko, Natalia, Kouba, Antonin, Kourantidou, Melina, Kurtul, Irmak, Laufer, Gabriel, Lipták, Boris, Liu, Chunlong, López-López, Eugenia, Lozano, Vanessa, Mammola, Stefano, Marchini, Agnese, Meshkova, Valentina, Milardi, Marco, Musolin, Dmitri L., Nuñez, Martin A., Oficialdegui, Francisco J., Patoka, Jiri, Pattison, Zarah, Pincheira-Donoso, Daniel, Piria, Marina, Probert, Anna F., Rasmussen, Jess Jessen, Renault, David, Ribeiro, Filipe, Rilov, Gil, Robinson, Tamara B., Sanchez, Axel E., Schwindt, Evangelina, South, Josie, Stoett, Peter, Verreycken, Hugo, Vilizzi, Lorenzo, Wang, Yong-Jian, Watari, Yuya, Wehi, Priscilla M., Weiperth, András, Wiberg-Larsen, Peter, Yapici, Sercan, Yogurtçuoglu, Baran, Zenni, Rafael D., Galil, Bella S., Dick, Jamie T. A., Russell, James C., Ricciardi, Anthony (1965-), Simberloff, Daniel (1942-), Bradshaw, Corey J. A., Haubrock, Phillip J. 2024 Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 99(4): 1357-1390.Documents numériques
Consultable
article (2024)URL
Titre : Unveiling the hidden economic toll of biological invasions in the European Union Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Morgane Henry ; Brian Leung ; Ross N. Cuthbert ; Thomas W. Bodey ; Danish A. Ahmed ; Elena Angulo ; Paride Balzani ; Elizabeta Briski ; Franck Courchamp ; Philip Eric Hulme ; Antonin Kouba ; Melina Kourantidou ; Chunlong Liu ; Rafael L. Macedo ; Francisco J. Oficialdegui ; David Renault ; Ismael Soto ; Ali Serhan Tarkan ; Anna J. Turbelin ; Corey J. A. Bradshaw ; Phillip J. Haubrock Année de publication : 2023 Article en page(s) : 43 Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : BackgroundBiological invasions threaten the functioning of ecosystems, biodiversity, and human well-being by degrading ecosystem services and eliciting massive economic costs. The European Union has historically been a hub for cultural development and global trade, and thus, has extensive opportunities for the introduction and spread of alien species. While reported costs of biological invasions to some member states have been recently assessed, ongoing knowledge gaps in taxonomic and spatio-temporal data suggest that these costs were considerably underestimated.ResultsWe used the latest available cost data in InvaCost (v4.1)-the most comprehensive database on the costs of biological invasions-to assess the magnitude of this underestimation within the European Union via projections of current and future invasion costs. We used macroeconomic scaling and temporal modelling approaches to project available cost information over gaps in taxa, space, and time, thereby producing a more complete estimate for the European Union economy. We identified that only 259 out of 13,331 (similar to 1%) known invasive alien species have reported costs in the European Union. Using a conservative subset of highly reliable, observed, country-level cost entries from 49 species (totalling US$4.7 billion; 2017 value), combined with the establishment data of alien species within European Union member states, we projected unreported cost data for all member states.ConclusionsOur corrected estimate of observed costs was potentially 501% higher (US$28.0 billion) than currently recorded. Using future projections of current estimates, we also identified a substantial increase in costs and costly species (US$148.2 billion) by 2040. We urge that cost reporting be improved to clarify the economic impacts of greatest concern, concomitant with coordinated international action to prevent and mitigate the impacts of invasive alien species in the European Union and globally. Lien pérenne : DOI : 10.1186/s12302-023-00750-3 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=151818
in Environmental sciences Europe > 35 (2023) . - 43Henry, Morgane, Leung, Brian, Cuthbert, Ross N., Bodey, Thomas W., Ahmed, Danish A., Angulo, Elena, Balzani, Paride, Briski, Elizabeta, Courchamp, Franck, Hulme, Philip Eric, Kouba, Antonin, Kourantidou, Melina, Liu, Chunlong, Macedo, Rafael L., Oficialdegui, Francisco J., Renault, David, Soto, Ismael, Tarkan, Ali Serhan, Turbelin, Anna J., Bradshaw, Corey J. A., Haubrock, Phillip J. 2023 Unveiling the hidden economic toll of biological invasions in the European Union. Environmental sciences Europe, 35: 43.Documents numériques
Article (2023)URL
