Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Pablo González-Moreno |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (4)
Affiner la rechercheConsistency in impact assessments of invasive species is generally high and depends on protocols and impact types / Rubén Bernardo-Madrid in Neobiota, 76 (2022)
Titre : Consistency in impact assessments of invasive species is generally high and depends on protocols and impact types Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Rubén Bernardo-Madrid ; Pablo González-Moreno ; Belinda Gallardo ; Sven Bacher ; Montserrat Vilà Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : 163-190 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : Impact assessments can help prioritising limited resources for invasive species management. However, their usefulness to provide information for decision-making depends on their repeatability, i.e. the consistency of the estimated impact. Previous studies have provided important insights into the consistency of final scores and rankings. However, due to the criteria to summarise protocol responses into one value (e.g. maximum score observed) or to categorise those final scores into prioritisation levels, the real consistency at the answer level remains poorly understood. Here, we fill this gap by quantifying and comparing the consistency in the scores of protocol questions with inter-rater reliability metrics. We provide an overview of impact assessment consistency and the factors altering it, by evaluating 1,742 impact assessments of 60 terrestrial, freshwater and marine vertebrates, invertebrates and plants conducted with seven protocols applied in Europe (EICAT; EPPO; EPPO prioritisation; GABLIS; GB; GISS; and Harmonia+). Assessments include questions about diverse impact types: environment, biodiversity, native species interactions, hybridisation, economic losses and human health. Overall, the great majority of assessments (67%) showed high consistency; only a small minority (13%) presented low consistency. Consistency of responses did not depend on species identity or the amount of information on their impacts, but partly depended on the impact type evaluated and the protocol used, probably due to linguistic uncertainties (pseudo-R2 = 0.11 and 0.10, respectively). Consistency of responses was highest for questions on ecosystem and human health impacts and lowest for questions regarding biological interactions amongst alien and native species. Regarding protocols, consistency was highest with Harmonia+ and GISS and lowest with EPPO. The presence of few, but very low, consistent assessments indicates that there is room for improvement in the repeatability of assessments. As no single factor explained largely the variance in consistency, low values can rely on multiple factors. We thus endorse previous studies calling for diverse and complementary actions, such as improving protocols and guidelines or consensus assessment to increase impact assessment repeatability. Nevertheless, we conclude that impact assessments were generally highly consistent and, therefore, useful in helping to prioritise resources against the continued relentless rise of invasive species. Lien pérenne : DOI : 10.3897/neobiota.76.83028 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=154111
in Neobiota > 76 (2022) . - 163-190Bernardo-Madrid, Rubén, González-Moreno, Pablo, Gallardo, Belinda, Bacher, Sven, Vilà, Montserrat 2022 Consistency in impact assessments of invasive species is generally high and depends on protocols and impact types. Neobiota, 76: 163-190.Documents numériques
Consultable
article (2022)Adobe Acrobat PDF
Titre : Identification of potential invasive alien species in Spain through horizon scanning Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Carlos Cano-Barbacil ; Martina Carrete ; Pilar Castro-Diez ; Miguel Delibes-Mateos ; Josep A. Jacques ; Marta Lopez-Darias ; Manuel Nogales ; Joan Pino ; Macarena Ros ; Anna Traveset ; Xavier Turon ; Montserrat Vilà ; Maria Altamirano ; Inés Alvarez ; Andrés Arias ; Dani Boix ; Carlos Cabido ; Eva Cacabelos ; Fernando Cobo ; Joaquín Cruz ; José A. Cuesta ; Beatriz Dáder ; Pedro del Estal ; Belinda Gallardo ; Miguel Gómez Laporta ; Pablo González-Moreno ; José Carlos Hernández ; Borja Jiménez-Alfaro ; Adrián Lázaro-Lobo ; Mar Leza ; Marta Montserrat ; Francisco J. Oliva-Paterna ; Laura Piñeiro ; Carlos Ponce ; Pere Pons ; Roser Rotchés Ribalta ; Nuria Roura-Pascual ; Marta Sanchez ; Alejandro Trillo ; Elisa Viñuela ; Emili García-Berthou Année de publication : 2023 Article en page(s) : 118696 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : Invasive alien species have widespread impacts on native biodiversity and ecosystem services. Since the number of introductions worldwide is continuously rising, it is essential to prevent the entry, establishment and spread of new alien species through a systematic examination of future potential threats. Applying a three-step horizon scanning consensus method, we evaluated non-established alien species that could potentially arrive, establish and cause major ecological impact in Spain within the next 10 years. Overall, we identified 47 species with a very high risk (e.g. Oreochromis niloticus, Popillia japonica, Hemidactylus frenatus, Crassula helmsii or Halophila stipulacea), 61 with high risk, 93 with moderate risk, and 732 species with low risk. Many of the species categorized as very high or high risk to Spanish biodiversity are either already present in Europe and neighbouring countries or have a long invasive history elsewhere. This study provides an updated list of potential invasive alien species useful for prioritizing efforts and resources against their introduction. Compared to previous horizon scanning exercises in Spain, the current study screens potential invaders from a wider range of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine organisms, and can serve as a basis for more comprehensive risk analyses to improve management and increase the efficiency of the early warning and rapid response framework for invasive alien species. We also stress the usefulness of measuring agreement and consistency as two different properties of the reliability of expert scores, in order to more easily elaborate consensus ranked lists of potential invasive alien species. Lien pérenne : DOI : 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118696 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=154490
in Journal of environmental management > 345 (2023) . - 118696Cano-Barbacil, Carlos, Carrete, Martina, Castro-Diez, Pilar, Delibes-Mateos, Miguel, Jacques, Josep A., Lopez-Darias, Marta, Nogales, Manuel, Pino, Joan, Ros, Macarena, Traveset, Anna, Turon, Xavier, Vilà, Montserrat, Altamirano, Maria, Alvarez, Inés, Arias, Andrés, Boix, Dani, Cabido, Carlos, Cacabelos, Eva, Cobo, Fernando, Cruz, Joaquín, Cuesta, José A., Dáder, Beatriz, Estal, Pedro del, Gallardo, Belinda, Gómez Laporta, Miguel, González-Moreno, Pablo, Hernández, José Carlos, Jiménez-Alfaro, Borja, Lázaro-Lobo, Adrián, Leza, Mar, Montserrat, Marta, Oliva-Paterna, Francisco J., Piñeiro, Laura, Ponce, Carlos, Pons, Pere, Rotchés Ribalta, Roser, Roura-Pascual, Nuria, Sanchez, Marta, Trillo, Alejandro, Viñuela, Elisa, García-Berthou, Emili 2023 Identification of potential invasive alien species in Spain through horizon scanning. Journal of environmental management, 345: 118696.Documents numériques
Consultable
article (2023)URL
Titre : Risks posed by invasive species to the provision of ecosystem services in Europe Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Belinda Gallardo ; Sven Bacher ; Anna Marcia Barbosa ; Laure Gallien ; Pablo González-Moreno ; Víctor Martínez-Bolea ; Cascade Sorte ; Giovanni Vimercati ; Montserrat Vilà Année de publication : 2024 Article en page(s) : 2631 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : Invasive species significantly impact biodiversity and ecosystem services, yet understanding these effects at large spatial scales remains a challenge. Our study addresses this gap by assessing the current and potential future risks posed by 94 invasive species to seven key ecosystem services in Europe. We demonstrate widespread potential impacts, particularly on outdoor recreation, habitat maintenance, crop provisioning, and soil and nitrogen retention. Exposure to invasive species was higher in areas with lower provision of ecosystem services, particularly for regulating and cultural services. Exposure was also high in areas where ecosystem contributions to crop provision and nitrogen retention were at their highest. Notably, regions vital for ecosystem services currently have low invasion suitability, but face an average 77% increase in potential invasion area. Here we show that, while high-value ecosystem service areas at the highest risk represent a small fraction of Europe (0-13%), they are disproportionally important for service conservation. Our study underscores the importance of monitoring and protecting these hotspots to align management strategies with international biodiversity targets, considering both invasion vulnerability and ecosystem service sustainability. Lien pérenne : DOI : 10.1038/s41467-024-46818-3 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=153666
in Nature communications > 15 (2024) . - 2631Gallardo, Belinda, Bacher, Sven, Barbosa, Anna Marcia, Gallien, Laure, González-Moreno, Pablo, Martínez-Bolea, Víctor, Sorte, Cascade, Vimercati, Giovanni, Vilà, Montserrat 2024 Risks posed by invasive species to the provision of ecosystem services in Europe. Nature communications, 15: 2631.Documents numériques
Consultable
article (2024)Adobe Acrobat PDF
Titre : Using structured eradication feasibility assessment to prioritize the management of new and emerging invasive alien species in Europe Type de document : Imprimé Auteurs : Olaf Booy ; Pete A. Robertson ; Niall Moore ; Jess Ward ; Helen E. Roy ; Tim Adriaens ; Richard Shaw ; Johannes Leonardus Cornelis Hendrikus van Valkenburg (1964) ; Gabrielle Wyn ; Sandro Bertolino ; Olivier Blight ; Étienne Branquart ; Giuseppe Brundu ; Joe Caffrey ; Dario Capizzi ; J. Casaer ; Olivier De Clerck ; Neil E. Coughlan ; Eithne Davis ; Jamie T. A. Dick ; Franz Essl (1973-) ; Guillaume Fried ; Piero Genovesi (1960-) ; Pablo González-Moreno ; Frank Huysentruyt ; Stuart R. Jenkins ; Francis Kerckhof ; Frances Lucy ; Wolfgang Nentwig (1953-) ; Jonathan Newman ; Wolfgang Rabitsch (1968-) ; Sugoto Roy ; Uwe Starfinger ; Paul Stebbing ; Jan Stuyck ; Mike Sutton-Croft ; Elena Tricarico ; Sonia Vanderhoeven ; Hugo Verreycken ; Aileen C. Mill Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : 6235-6250 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [CBNPMP-Thématique] Plantes subspontanées, naturalisées, envahissantes Résumé : Prioritizing the management of invasive alien species (IAS) is of global importance and within Europe integral to the EU IAS regulation. To prioritize management effectively, the risks posed by IAS need to be assessed, but so too does the feasibility of their management. While the risk of IAS to the EU has been assessed, the feasibility of management has not. We assessed the feasibility of eradicating 60 new (not yet established) and 35 emerging (established with limited distribution) species that pose a threat to the EU, as identified by horizon scanning. The assessment was carried out by 34 experts in invasion management from across Europe, applying the Non-Native Risk Management scheme to defined invasion scenarios and eradication strategies for each species, assessing the feasibility of eradication using seven key risk management criteria. Management priorities were identified by combining scores for risk (derived from horizon scanning) and feasibility of eradication. The results show eradication feasibility score and risk score were not correlated, indicating that risk management criteria evaluate different information than risk assessment. In all, 17 new species were identified as particularly high priorities for eradication should they establish in the future, whereas 14 emerging species were identified as priorities for eradication now. A number of species considered highest priority for eradication were terrestrial vertebrates, a group that has been the focus of a number of eradication attempts in Europe. However, eradication priorities also included a diverse range of other taxa (plants, invertebrates and fish) suggesting there is scope to broaden the taxonomic range of attempted eradication in Europe. We demonstrate that broad scale structured assessments of management feasibility can help prioritize IAS for management. Such frameworks are needed to support evidence-based decision-making. Lien pérenne : DOI : 10.1111/gcb.15280 Permalink : https://biblio.cbnpmp.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=153671
in Global Change Biology > 26 (11) (2020) . - 6235-6250Booy, Olaf, Robertson, Pete A., Moore, Niall, Ward, Jess, Roy, Helen E., Adriaens, Tim, Shaw, Richard, Valkenburg, Johannes Leonardus Cornelis Hendrikus van (1964), Wyn, Gabrielle, Bertolino, Sandro, Blight, Olivier, Branquart, Étienne, Brundu, Giuseppe, Caffrey, Joe, Capizzi, Dario, Casaer, J., De Clerck, Olivier, Coughlan, Neil E., Davis, Eithne, Dick, Jamie T. A., Essl, Franz (1973-), Fried, Guillaume, Genovesi, Piero (1960-), González-Moreno, Pablo, Huysentruyt, Frank, Jenkins, Stuart R., Kerckhof, Francis, Lucy, Frances, Nentwig, Wolfgang (1953-), Newman, Jonathan, Rabitsch, Wolfgang (1968-), Roy, Sugoto, Starfinger, Uwe, Stebbing, Paul, Stuyck, Jan, Sutton-Croft, Mike, Tricarico, Elena, Vanderhoeven, Sonia, Verreycken, Hugo, Mill, Aileen C. 2020 Using structured eradication feasibility assessment to prioritize the management of new and emerging invasive alien species in Europe. Global Change Biology, 26(11): 6235-6250.Documents numériques
article (2020)URL
